Tuesday
Nov102009

Always my yogini

For the first time in two years, Esme won't be taking yoga class. 

My little yogini, pictured in the Butterfly Pose when she was 3...

 

... won't be headed to MIss Jackie's Monday afternoons to balance books on her head, make up animal poses, and learn how to breathe through frustration and anger. 

I've been trying for days to figure out why this makes my heart so heavy. I only put the pieces together last night when Kent remarked how tall Esme looked. It's something my mother has remarked on of late as well: how much older and adult-like she's becoming. 

The change is stunning sometimes. She walks into a room and I see a stranger almost. Who replaced my baby with a girl?

Her face is thinning, a development that draws particular attention to the delicate uptick of her nose. Her limbs - always lean - seem downright lanky. The most dramatic change, though, centers in her eyes. 

Even when she was a baby, Esme bore into people with unnerving intensity: so probing, so serious. But now her eyes seem so mature too. And more vulnerable, like she's finally old enough to know there's a world of hurt that awaits her. 

Esme flirted with swim lessons and soccer over the years but lost interest in both. Yoga remained her constant; she's been going every week since she turned 3. 

Each Monday, she pulled her leotard and tights from her drawer and readied for class. Never mind that everyone else wore shorts and shirts; Esme insisted on her self-styled uniform. The only modification: she ditched the tights in the summer heat. 

More than once, friends stopped their cars to gawk over the terrible sweetness of one of her fanny cheeks and a slice of underpants hanging from her leotard as we walked down the sidewalk. 

It's such a precious memory, right? But it's an image of a toddler and she's not that anymore. That's the point. That's the source of the sadness. For me, her toddlerhood and yoga go hand in hand. Shedding one, means shelving the other. 

And when I made that connection, I started thinking of two contemporary dances that slay me with their intensity, physicality, rawness and grief. It seems like a tangent, but stay with me here, it's not. 

I'm such a crap dancer that I nearly never dance in front of friends or strangers. I'm all wild abandon and absurdity with the children. But others? The fear of judgment paralyzes me. 

It comes as a huge surprise to many then that I'm a devout fan of "So You Think You Can Dance." There's a lot of stupid banter and, of late, they're trying too hard to pull heart strings, but at its core it's a show that celebrates dance: gifted dancers and inspired choreography. 

I have been profoundly moved by more than a handful of dances over the past several years. So overcome that I search out videos of the dances a year and two years later and play them over and over and over and over. 

Last week, one pair danced a contemporary piece that told the story of a woman struggling with fear. Legacy, a b-boy dancer, personified fear and dogged his partner, Kathryn, throughout. At one point, he flung himself onto her waist and wrapped his entire body around her. 

Last year, another couple told the story of drug addiction. Kupono attacked Kayla in wild desperation with his arms, his legs, his hands, his lips as she labored to break free and he fought to hang on.

I'm reminded of these pieces because as a mother I feel like the characters these guys are playing: I feel like I'm fighting, scratching, clawing, DYING to keep hold of my babies. Even as they do what they should, do what they need to do, and rip away from me. One arm, one leg, one hand at a time. 

Sunday
Nov082009

Hard Corps

My father and I sit at opposite ends of the political spectrum. We don't agree to disagree so much as we've just learned not to talk about politics EVER.

Luckily, he left on his annual trek to the remote wilds of Maine a few days ago so I'm hoping he's safely shrouded in a media blackout and didn't hear the news that Democrats passed a health care bill. One I largely applaud but that he no doubt would greet with an angry roar. 

KA-BAM!

Hear that? That would have been the sound of his computer crashing through the wall as he read the headline. 

It's better this way. Trust me.

Perhaps it's better too that he's not around to hear my latest hair-brained idea. See, I've made plans for me and my father next year; we're running the Marine Corps Marathon. 

BOOM!

Did you hear that? That's the sound of my father falling over in the woods. 

Six years ago, I hatched another -  far crazier - adventure for us: a 219-mile winter slog along the Appalachian Trail. At the time, Kent and I were nearing the end of an adoption process that started after we spent three desperately sad years trying to have a baby. And failing miserably. 

I wanted to walk myself to exhaustion. I craved the simple monotony of one foot in front of the other. I sought the comfort of my father as I struggled to become a mother.

A hard-core hiker and outdoor enthusiast since his youth, my father naturally agreed. 

We bought tents and mapped routes. Kent, though jealous, excitedly planned food drops. He was on board though others thought I'd lost my mind. Three weeks alone in the woods? In the winter? ARE YOU INSANE? 

And then...

The adoption fell through and I got pregnant with Esme. When we didn't miscarry, when we realized this pregnancy might actually work, the idea of scrambling over icy rocks in drifting snow lost its luster. The plan was shelved. 

I don't know what sparked my latest epic idea. I'm a walker, not a runner. I hate running, really. It hurts me. Worse still, it BORES me. The longest distance I ever clocked was five miles and I was so impressed with myself I never did it again. Ok, maybe not never. But hardly ever.

So I was pretty surprised to find myself running this morning on what I planned as a long walk through several neighborhoods. Running. Gasping for breath. Ignoring the pain in my legs. And thinking. Thinking about how much I'd like to do a long run with my father, how much I'd love the time we'd spend together preparing for the race.  

The talking; the planning; the practicing; the bitching; the ribbing; the accomplishment!  Think of the bond. Think of the stories. 

(Try not to think of the pain.)

I even designed the T-shirts we'll wear: Black, emblazoned with gold lettering on the front that reads: HARD CORPS. And on the back of his: DAD. And mine: DAUGHTER.

I got so totally lost in thought on my walk - RUN? - that I didn't hear the BEEP BEEP BEEP! of my heart monitor watch until it started sending smoke signals. I stole a glance at my wrist and saw my heart rate hovering at 192. 

Best to walk a few blocks, no?

Anyway, so engrossed was I with the plans that I also didn't realize how far I went: 4.5 miles. 

Not too shabby for my first stab at this, right?

Whooboy, my father's gonna be surprised when he comes out of the woods to find he's been challenged to a 26.2 mile foot race. Even more surprised than the fact that health care reform cleared the House. 

Saturday
Nov072009

Natural Medicine

The towering oak tree that shades our back yard so beautifully from scorching summer sun also happens to drop six hundred thousand leaves for us to rake and bag every autumn.

The entire house has suffered from one variety of funk or another - swine flu, sinus infection, hacking coughs, extreme fevers - since last weekend. So, I thought it was time for a little outdoor medicine. 

We donned dresses and tights, vests and shoes, threw open the door and tumbled outside whereupon the little people commenced whining, complaining, crying, shouting and coveting sand shovels. 

Oh, for the love of God people, can't we enjoy the sunny day and the gorgeous weather?!

The answer: Yes!

Behold:

Kent made a rain shower of leaves.

 

That Uma rolled in.

 

And Josephine ran under.

 

Esme shared moss with Josephine.

 

And Desmond shared a leaf pile with Uma.

 

I fawned over my oak leaf hydrangea for the umpteenth time this year. Really, could it be more beautiful?

 

And the girls found a sunny spot to rest after big play on a spectacular autumn day. 

 

Look at those feet.

 

Look at that face! Even I feel better now.

Thursday
Nov052009

How low can you go, WaPo?

As a former newspaper reporter, I feel like a dirty traitor saying this: but I just might cancel our subscription to The Washington Post. 

That's how much I hate what they've done with the paper.

I grew up reading the Post and even delivered it on occasion when neighbors with paper routes went on vacation. I remember piecing together the Sunday paper from various stacks piled high on the floor of the garage. Then delivering the behemoths as the sun rose over our suburban streets with my father's massive blue wheelbarrow. 

My love - and allegiance - for my hometown paper runs deep, in other words. 

I revered Mary Jordan like others look up to rock stars; I picked Colman McCarthy when a college professor asked us to write about someone we admired (he even gave me a tour of the newsroom); and my ultimate career goal, for a time, was to work in the Post's Tokyo Bureau. 

When we moved back to the area several years ago, from a place I didn't want to leave, one of the few positives was that I got to walk out my door every morning and find the Post on my sidewalk. 

A lot has happened to the paper in the past three years. A lot of crummy crap in my opinion. 

It started when they dropped the "Life is Short" feature from the Sunday Style section. I loved that feature. It was the first thing I looked for when I opened the Sunday paper. And I wasn't alone. When I had my own 100-word piece published, friends, neighbors and strangers in the coffee shop stopped to tell me they saw my haiku.  To a person, they told me it was the feature they looked forward to most. 

A few months later, it was gone. 

Then, in no particular order, the Post dropped Book World; folded a separate Arts section into Style on Sundays, ditched a stand-alone Business section; revamped the Weather page into something unhelpful and lamentable; created a Local Living insert that's not at all enticing and altogether forgettable; made the WP Magazine seem more like a cartoon than a periodical; and then, AND THEN.... 

A few days before Halloween, I pulled the paper out of the delivery bag to find what the paper's ombudsman described as "the most significant redesign in more than a decade."

Was this a trick? It certainly wasn't a treat!

My head spins when I look at it. Like I've just gone ten rounds of "Ring Around the Rosy" with the kids. There's so much going on - so many competing fonts and colors - that my eyes don't focus on anything. 

And let me just say, I'm NOT a fan of the writer's portraits. Or the remodeled Reliable Source (it's bigger but definitely not better) and Date Lab features. The last of which was a topic at a recent Halloween party. Note to the Post: no one at the party liked the change or understood the reason for it.

Sometimes it feels like the people in charge are throwing spaghetti at a wall to see what sticks. I know newspapers are suffering but why do the readers have to suffer too? 

The Post's ombudsman expressed surprise that so few readers told the paper what they thought about the change. And he noted that only 10 cancelled their subscriptions over the redesign. An editor at the paper suggested the reason may be because people are receptive to change.

I'll offer a different theory. How about this? We feel beat down and worn out by the changes and rather than wage an impossible battle, we disengage and give up. We bitch on Facebook or at parties. We yell at our spouses at the breakfast table, "Do you see what they've done now? Can you read this? I can't read this. WHAT'S ANOTHER WORD FOR CRAP?"

And we consider canceling the paper. 

It breaks my heart to say it, especially because I want my four young children to continue to see the paper around the house. To point out their president - "Look, it's Bak Bama." To ask questions about photographs and words. To wonder about stories Kent and I talk about.

A few weeks ago, I walked into the kitchen where Josephine had the paper spread out before her. "I'm the Mommy," she said. "I read the newspaper."

Sadly, that may not be the case any longer.

Wednesday
Nov042009

Daylight Saving Saves No One

Dear Tobias:

I know you're just a wee lad -- only 14 months and all - so you can be excused for your unfamiliarity with Daylight Saving Time and the proper etiquette surrounding it. 

You've been a good member of the team so far, but unless you want to be benched or traded to another team, you're gonna have to figure this one out buddy.

Did you see the clock this morning? It said 4:46 a.m. 

As in 4 o'clock. IN THE MORNING! A classmate from high school calls that "the butt crack of dawn." I tend to agree.

It's when donut makers, newspaper delivery folks and farmers start their day. Not us.

Did you happen to look out the window? Totally dark. That's a dead give away, Mister. It means it's nighttime and, stay with me here, I know it's a hard concept, but nighttime means sleep time.  

As if you needed anymore clues to the obvious, did you notice that no one else in the house was awake? The lights were off. Everyone was quiet. 

Except you! 

Listen, most of us big people don't get it either. We change the clocks twice a year because that's what we're told to do. It's a centuries old notion to give us more light on delicious summer nights and dreadful winter mornings.

The Internet tells me it saves energy, encourages shopping, fuels the economy and cuts down on traffic accidents. It also tells me that pedestrian fatalities skyrocket the first few weeks after the clocks are set back in autumn. 

That's what we call yin and yang. You'll learn about that later. 

Anyway, Wikipedia tries to explain the arbitrary time change like this: 

"Daylight Saving is the practice in some places of adjusting clocks forward in the Spring and back in the Fall, usually by one hour, so that the adjustment causes parents heads to explode when their children wake an hour early and caterwaul to the heavens until those parents drag themselves from bed, scrape their brains off the floor and walk like zombies from Day of the Dead."

Ok, so I made up the back half of that definition.

But now that you know what Daylight Saving is, here are the new family rules:

Dinner is at 5 o'clock. Please don't start stalking me through the house an hour earlier, head-butting my legs and screaming at my back. 

Bedtime is at 7 p.m. Don't you dare flame out any sooner. 

And now, for the non-negotiable....

Morning starts at 6 a.m. - the NEW 6 o'clock - and not a minute earlier. Break this rule, Mr. Man, and we're sending you to Grandpa's house. 

Hugs and kisses, 

Mama